KANK the movie has forced many to stop and look back at their own marriages.I find so many people finding reasons to walk the talk that has been advocated by the movie.But yet how good or bad is it for our society is food for thought.I have always been intrigued by human relationships.They have always been a focus of observation.
What is it that would force one to walk away from a very good marital relationship or an excellent spouse? Just the penchant to take risks and believe in the clandestine liasion or does it have more meaning attached to it?
Is it possible to leave something precious which one has for something which one doesn't ?
I have always been a firm believer in "One in the hand is worth two in the bush" but how does it guarantee that the bush factor will not entice me ? Am I not human after all ?
What are the reasons behind one spouse practising infidelity irrespective of an excellent bonding with the spouse?
What is worse :Emotional infidelity or physical ?
So many questions to my inquisitive mind...but as always , the bottomline is "Pastures on the other side always seem greener..."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
I haven't seen the movie but for me "food for thought" is the larger question of morality.
If you take morals as "fixed .. beyond question" then everything else should fall into place. But it doesn't because "control" implicit in "morals" is against human nature....as much as striving for morality is part of it. End result - fidelty and infidelty co-exist. Good and bad - as for so many other things.
Whether morals themsleves be put up for re-evaluation is a question best avoided as one would need many lives for it.
Post a Comment